Filing Flows › Companies › Group 1 Automotive › Earnings quality
Group 1 Automotive earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score64 / 100 · grade C · rank 591 of 1027
Group 1 Automotive (GPI) scores 64 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 591 of 1027 companies and 90 of 141 in consumer-disc. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 55% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 17% below GAAP, Piotroski F-score 6 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for Montier C-score 0 of 4 checks failed.
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 55% of companies (profit backed by cash) | 13 | 29 |
| Montier C-score | Montier C-score 0 of 4 checks failed | 21 | 21 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +1.6% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 10 | 14 |
| Piotroski F-score | Piotroski F-score 6 of 9 | 10 | 14 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 17% below GAAP | 6 | 14 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.45) | 4 | 7 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Group 1 Automotive: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.