Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Ichor Holdings › Analysis traps

Ichor Holdings (ICHR): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 25, 2026, filed Nov 3, 2026; rules v1.1

Ichor Holdings (ICHR): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 25, 2026. 1 to review; 1 with insufficient data; 3 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high

The DCF's point value is 4.98 a share (price 38.90); 74% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -2.53 to 11.04; across every method the research ran the range is -27 to 390. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise ($10M → −$6M): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before$28M
Operating cash flow$30M
Capex, year before$18M
Capex$36M
Free cash flow, year before$10M
Free cash flow−$6M
Change in FCF−$17M
Change in capex$19M
Working capital: change in its cash contribution$6M

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 1.8% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$17M
Revenue$948M
SBC / revenue+1.8%
Buybacks0
Buybacks / SBC0.0
Diluted shares, year before32.8M shares
Diluted shares34.2M shares
Diluted shares: change+4.5%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew 67% against revenue 37% in Q3 2026; DSO 34 against a median of 31: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ3 2026
Revenue, year over year+37.4%
Receivables, year over year+66.6%
Quarter beforeQ2 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before+22.7%
Receivables y/y, quarter before+29.5%
Days sales outstanding34.0
DSO, median of eight quarters31.0
Receivables$141M
Revenue$329M

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$6M comes due within a year, 34.2× covered by cash and investments of $214M.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$214M
Debt$119M
Net debt−$94M
Due within a year$6M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months−$67M
Cash plus free cash flow$214M
Coverage of what is due34.2
Due in the second year$8M
Balance sheet date2026-09-25

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not applicable

a loss in one of the quarters: EPS growth has no meaning

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium

Net income of $4M is not at a cyclical high against the last eight years (median $33M, best $73M): the P/E of 422.3× is on a normal year.

The figures and how they are read
market value$1.5B
net income ttm$4M
pe ttm422.30
net income median fy$33M
pe mid cycle44.60
net income peak fy$73M
yearsFY2018 / 58.0; FY2019 / 11.0; FY2020 / 33.0; FY2021 / 71.0; FY2022 / 73.0; FY2023 / -43.0; FY2024 / -21.0; FY2025 / -53.0
down years in window3

P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median

Source: Q3 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high

The DCF's point value is 4.98 a share (price 38.90); 74% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -2.53 to 11.04; across every method the research ran the range is -27 to 390. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

The figures and how they are read
dcf value4.98
price38.90
terminal value share+73.9%
swing by inputOperating margin / ±3 pts / -2.53 / 11.04; Capex (share of revenue) / ±1 pt / 3.6 / 6.36; Working capital per $ of growth / ±10 pts / 3.7 / 6.27; WACC / ±1 pt / 4.73 / 5.28
range all methods-26.89; 390.14

the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran

Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Ichor Holdings: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.