Filing Flows › Companies › IDT › Analysis traps
IDT (IDT): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q4 FY26, to Jul 31, 2026, filed Sep 29, 2026; rules v1.1
IDT (IDT): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jul 31, 2026. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 66.38 a share (price 82.17); 75% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 47.27 to 85.50; across every method the research ran the range is -251 to 472. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($106M → $68M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY25 |
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $127M |
| Operating cash flow | $91M |
| Capex, year before | $21M |
| Capex | $23M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $106M |
| Free cash flow | $68M |
| Change in FCF | −$38M |
| Change in capex | $2M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | −$8M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY26 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY25 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 0.8% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Stock compensation | $11M |
| Revenue | $1.3B |
| SBC / revenue | +0.8% |
| Buybacks | 0 |
| Buybacks / SBC | 0.0 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 25.3M shares |
| Diluted shares | 25.0M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | -1.1% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY26 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew 35% against revenue 7% in Q4 FY26; DSO 14 against a median of 13: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q4 FY26 |
| Revenue, year over year | +7.1% |
| Receivables, year over year | +35.2% |
| Quarter before | Q3 FY26 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +4.5% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | -3.1% |
| Days sales outstanding | 13.9 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 12.8 |
| Receivables | $61M |
| Revenue | $339M |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q4 FY26 (receivables and revenue) · Q4 FY25 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Insufficient data
no debt figure could be read from the balance sheet (the filing may tag it in other lines)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 1% and net income fell 0% in Q3 FY26; the share count fell 1.3%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 FY26 |
| Quarter before | Q3 FY25 |
| EPS, year before | $0.86 |
| EPS | $0.87 |
| Net income, year before | $22M |
| Net income | $22M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 25.2M shares |
| Diluted shares | 24.9M shares |
| EPS growth | +0.9% |
| Net income growth | -0.4% |
| Diluted shares: change | -1.3% |
| eps from profit | $0.00 |
| eps from share count | $0.01 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q3 FY26 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 FY25 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium
Net income of $95M is a high, but the last eight years rose almost every year (median $64M): a steady climb, not a cycle's top, so the P/E of 21.5× is not on peak profit in that sense.
The figures and how they are read
| market value | $2.0B |
| net income ttm | $95M |
| pe ttm | 21.50 |
| net income median fy | $64M |
| pe mid cycle | 31.80 |
| net income peak fy | $96M |
| years | FY19 / 0.0; FY20 / 21.0; FY21 / 96.0; FY22 / 27.0; FY23 / 40.0; FY24 / 64.0; FY25 / 76.0; FY26 / 87.0 |
| down years in window | 1 |
P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median
Source: Q4 FY26 (net income, trailing twelve months)
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 66.38 a share (price 82.17); 75% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 47.27 to 85.50; across every method the research ran the range is -251 to 472. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 66.38 |
| price | 82.17 |
| terminal value share | +74.8% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / 47.27 / 85.5; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 55.93 / 78.91; WACC / ±1 pt / 58.28 / 77.6; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 62.32 / 70.45 |
| range all methods | -250.88; 472.41 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → IDT: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.