Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Ionis Pharmaceuticals › Earnings quality

Ionis Pharmaceuticals earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score51 / 100 · grade C · rank 865 of 1027

Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS) scores 51 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 865 of 1027 companies and 105 of 126 in health. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.5% of assets, higher than 58% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 42% below GAAP, Piotroski F-score 3 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.73).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.5% of assets, higher than 58% of companies (profit backed by cash)1229
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 1 of 4 checks failed1621
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -1.5% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1114
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 3 of 9514
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 42% below GAAP014
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.73)77
IONS: share of the available points, by componentIONS: share of the available points, by componentAccruals42%Discretionary accruals74%Montier C-score75%Piotroski F-score34%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Ionis Pharmaceuticals: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.