Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Hunt J B Transport Services › Earnings quality

Hunt J B Transport Services earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score77 / 100 · grade B · rank 111 of 1027

Hunt J B Transport Services (JBHT) scores 77 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 111 of 1027 companies and 13 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on discretionary accruals of -8.5% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed, accruals of -13.3% of assets, lower than 90% of companies (profit backed by cash). It earns full or near-full marks for adjusted earnings 3% below GAAP, Dechow F-score 0.48 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.24).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -13.3% of assets, lower than 90% of companies (profit backed by cash)2427
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.48 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1220
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -8.5% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most213
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 3% below GAAP1213
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.24)77
JBHT: share of the available points, by componentJBHT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals90%Discretionary accruals15%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score60%Non-GAAP gap91%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Hunt J B Transport Services: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.