Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Liberty Energy › Earnings quality

Liberty Energy earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 429 of 1027

Liberty Energy (LBRT) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 429 of 1027 companies and 23 of 34 in energy. It loses the most points on discretionary accruals of -5.8% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most, Montier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed, Piotroski F-score 4 of 9. It earns full or near-full marks for profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.97).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -13.5% of assets, lower than 91% of companies (profit backed by cash)2629
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 2 of 5 checks failed1321
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -5.8% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most414
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 4 of 9614
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 6% below GAAP1114
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.97)77
LBRT: share of the available points, by componentLBRT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals91%Discretionary accruals28%Montier C-score60%Piotroski F-score44%Non-GAAP gap79%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Liberty Energy: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.