Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › MasterBrand › Analysis traps

MasterBrand (MBC): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 27, 2026, filed Nov 6, 2026; rules v1.1

MasterBrand (MBC): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 27, 2026; 2 with insufficient data; 4 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

No rule is triggered on the latest filings, and none is marked to review.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise ($211M → $118M): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before$292M
Operating cash flow$196M
Capex, year before$81M
Capex$78M
Free cash flow, year before$211M
Free cash flow$118M
Change in FCF−$94M
Change in capex−$3M
Working capital: change in its cash contribution−$12M

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 0.6% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$16M
Revenue$2.7B
SBC / revenue+0.6%
Buybacks$18M
Buybacks / SBC1.1
Diluted shares, year before130.9M shares
Diluted shares129.2M shares
Diluted shares: change-1.3%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew 7% against revenue 48% in Q3 2026; DSO 21 against a median of 27: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ3 2026
Revenue, year over year+48.4%
Receivables, year over year+6.9%
Quarter beforeQ2 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before+11.5%
Receivables y/y, quarter before+13.0%
Days sales outstanding21.1
DSO, median of eight quarters27.4
Receivables$233M
Revenue$1.0B

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

Nothing comes due within a year; net debt is $1.1B.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$140M
Debt$1.2B
Net debt$1.1B
Due within a year0
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months$96M
Cash plus free cash flow$236M
Coverage of what is due—
Due in the second year0
Balance sheet date2026-09-27

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not applicable

a loss in one of the quarters: EPS growth has no meaning

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable

a loss on a trailing or mid-cycle basis: the P/E has no meaning

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → MasterBrand: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.