Filing Flows › Companies › MarketAxess Holdings › Analysis traps
MarketAxess Holdings (MKTX): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 6, 2026; rules v1.1
MarketAxess Holdings (MKTX): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 5 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 170.16 a share (price 164.64); 76% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving wacc by ±1 pt alone takes it from 141.02 to 217.03; across every method the research ran the range is 42 to 526. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not applicable
a financial company: free cash flow after capex is not the measure of its business
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 3.7% of revenue, but buybacks of $420M covered it (13.6×) and the diluted share count fell 1.4%: the dilution has been paid for in cash.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Stock compensation | $31M |
| Revenue | $846M |
| SBC / revenue | +3.6% |
| Buybacks | $420M |
| Buybacks / SBC | 13.6 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 37.7M shares |
| Diluted shares | 37.1M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | -1.4% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not applicable
a financial company: receivables and DSO are not its working capital
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Insufficient data
neither a maturity table nor the current portion of debt is on file
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS fell 17% and net income fell 21% in Q3 2026; the share count fell 4.9%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 2026 |
| Quarter before | Q3 2025 |
| EPS, year before | $1.84 |
| EPS | $1.53 |
| Net income, year before | $68M |
| Net income | $54M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 37.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 35.3M shares |
| EPS growth | -16.9% |
| Net income growth | -21.0% |
| Diluted shares: change | -4.9% |
| eps from profit | -$0.39 |
| eps from share count | $0.08 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q3 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable
a financial company: J06 reads its cycle instead
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 170.16 a share (price 164.64); 76% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving wacc by ±1 pt alone takes it from 141.02 to 217.03; across every method the research ran the range is 42 to 526. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 170.16 |
| price | 164.64 |
| terminal value share | +75.7% |
| swing by input | WACC / ±1 pt / 141.02 / 217.03; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 138.24 / 208.48; Terminal growth / ±0.5 pt / 159.2 / 184.01; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 158.7 / 181.62 |
| range all methods | 41.91; 525.7 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → MarketAxess Holdings: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.