Filing Flows › Companies › National Energy Services Reunited › Analysis traps
National Energy Services Reunited (NESR): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 10, 2026; rules v1.1
National Energy Services Reunited (NESR): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026. 3 to review; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Adjusted profit = economic profit To review · confidence low
Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 1 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.
Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued To review · confidence medium
Net income of $93M is at a high against a median of $17M over eight years; at 22.1× the market is not pricing it as cheap, but a multiple on this year's profit still understates the mid-cycle one (124.4×).
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 18.68 a share (price 19.96); 82% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 11.19 to 26.16; across every method the research ran the range is -30 to 99. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($124M → $121M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY2024 |
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $229M |
| Operating cash flow | $264M |
| Capex, year before | $105M |
| Capex | $143M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $124M |
| Free cash flow | $121M |
| Change in FCF | −$3M |
| Change in capex | $38M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | $74M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 0.6% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Stock compensation | $8M |
| Revenue | $1.3B |
| SBC / revenue | +0.6% |
| Buybacks | 0 |
| Buybacks / SBC | 0.0 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 95.7M shares |
| Diluted shares | 99.1M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | +3.5% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew 9% against revenue 59% in Q2 2026; DSO 38 against a median of 45: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q2 2026 |
| Revenue, year over year | +59.1% |
| Receivables, year over year | +9.3% |
| Quarter before | Q1 2026 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +33.5% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | +38.3% |
| Days sales outstanding | 38.2 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 44.8 |
| Receivables | $209M |
| Revenue | $521M |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q2 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q2 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit To review confidence low
Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 1 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap | 2025-09-30 / 0.16 / 0.18 / -0.125; 2026-03-31 / 0.26 / 0.23 / 0.115; 2026-06-30 / 0.44 / 0.43 / 0.023 |
| Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP | 1 |
| Quarters compared | 3 |
| Latest gap | +2.3% |
the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)
Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted 0.16 vs GAAP 0.18) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted 0.26 vs GAAP 0.23) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted 0.44 vs GAAP 0.43)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The reconciliation shows the excluded items ending (a restructuring with its final charge, a settlement paid) and the gap to GAAP closes in the next quarters
- The excluded items are only amortisation of acquired intangibles and the cash paid for the deals is in the investing cash flow
Look again: next filing.
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium
$69M comes due within a year, 4.8× covered by cash and investments of $175M plus $156M of free cash flow.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $175M |
| Debt | $275M |
| Net debt | $100M |
| Due within a year | $69M |
| Read from | the debt maturity table |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | $156M |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $331M |
| Coverage of what is due | 4.8 |
| Due in the second year | $64M |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-06-30 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: FY2024 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 173% and net income rose 190% in Q2 2026; the share count rose 5.7%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q2 2026 |
| Quarter before | Q2 2025 |
| EPS, year before | $0.16 |
| EPS | $0.43 |
| Net income, year before | $15M |
| Net income | $44M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 97.6M shares |
| Diluted shares | 103.2M shares |
| EPS growth | +173.1% |
| Net income growth | +189.6% |
| Diluted shares: change | +5.7% |
| eps from profit | $0.30 |
| eps from share count | -$0.02 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q2 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q2 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued To review confidence medium
Net income of $93M is at a high against a median of $17M over eight years; at 22.1× the market is not pricing it as cheap, but a multiple on this year's profit still understates the mid-cycle one (124.4×).
The figures and how they are read
| market value | $2.1B |
| net income ttm | $93M |
| pe ttm | 22.10 |
| net income median fy | $17M |
| pe mid cycle | 124.40 |
| net income peak fy | $76M |
| years | FY2016 / 8.0; FY2017 / 28.0; FY2020 / 17.0; FY2021 / -65.0; FY2022 / -36.0; FY2023 / 13.0; FY2024 / 76.0; FY2025 / 51.0 |
| down years in window | 3 |
P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median
Source: Q2 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)
What would show the trap does not apply
- Profit holds at this level through the next two years (the eight-year peak was a new base, not a top)
- The industry's capacity and prices stay where they are rather than reverting
Look again: next filing.
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 18.68 a share (price 19.96); 82% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 11.19 to 26.16; across every method the research ran the range is -30 to 99. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 18.68 |
| price | 19.96 |
| terminal value share | +81.7% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / 11.19 / 26.16; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 15.32 / 22.65; WACC / ±1 pt / 15.99 / 22.25; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 17.22 / 20.14 |
| range all methods | -30.11; 99.02 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → National Energy Services Reunited: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.