Filing Flows › Companies › National Health Investors › Analysis traps
National Health Investors (NHI): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 10, 2026; rules v1.1
National Health Investors (NHI): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026; 3 with insufficient data; 4 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
No rule is triggered on the latest filings, and none is marked to review.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not applicable
a financial company: free cash flow after capex is not the measure of its business
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 1.5% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Stock compensation | $6M |
| Revenue | $376M |
| SBC / revenue | +1.5% |
| Buybacks | 0 |
| Buybacks / SBC | 0.0 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 44.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 47.1M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | +6.7% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not applicable
a financial company: receivables and DSO are not its working capital
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Not triggered confidence low
Adjusted and GAAP EPS were within 10% of each other in the last 3 quarters.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap | 2025-09-30 / 0.6851 / 0.69 / -0.007; 2026-03-31 / 0.7706 / 0.82 / -0.064; 2026-06-30 / 1.15 / 1.15 / 0.0 |
| Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP | 0 |
| Quarters compared | 3 |
| Latest gap | +0.0% |
the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)
Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted 0.69 vs GAAP 0.69) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted 0.77 vs GAAP 0.82) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted 1.15 vs GAAP 1.15)
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Insufficient data
no debt figure could be read from the balance sheet (the filing may tag it in other lines)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Insufficient data
no quarter with EPS, net income and diluted shares for both this year and last
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable
a financial company: J06 reads its cycle instead
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data
no DCF in the valuation research for this company
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not triggered confidence medium
Net income of $141M is below the $170M of dividends, as a REIT's usually is: depreciation of buildings is not cash. Operating cash flow of $237M covers the dividend 1.4×; capex of $347M is larger than what is left, which is a funding question, not a payout one.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Net income | $141M |
| operating cash flow | $237M |
| dividends paid | $170M |
| capex | $347M |
| payout of net income | 1.21 |
| payout of ocf | 0.72 |
| payout of ocf after capex | — |
a REIT's net income is after depreciation of buildings that usually hold their value, so FFO / AFFO is the payout measure; here operating cash flow and operating cash flow after capex stand in for it (capex includes acquisitions of property where the filing lumps them)
Source: FY2025 (net income, operating cash flow, dividends and capex, fiscal year)
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → National Health Investors: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.