Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Pitney Bowes › Analysis traps

Pitney Bowes (PBI): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Oct 29, 2026; rules v1.1

Pitney Bowes (PBI): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026; 3 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

No rule is triggered on the latest filings, and none is marked to review.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence medium

Free cash flow rose $160M to $317M; working capital and lower capex explain 4% of it, so most of the gain is in operating cash flow itself.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before$229M
Operating cash flow$383M
Capex, year before$72M
Capex$66M
Free cash flow, year before$157M
Free cash flow$317M
Change in FCF$160M
Change in capex−$6M
Working capital: change in its cash contribution−$134M
Of which: capex cut$6M
Of which: working capital released0.00
Share of the increase that need not repeat+3.8%
Operating cash flow before working capital: change287783000.00

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 0.7% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$14M
Revenue$1.9B
SBC / revenue+0.8%
Buybacks$378M
Buybacks / SBC26.7
Diluted shares, year before182.5M shares
Diluted shares173.0M shares
Diluted shares: change-5.2%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew 0% against revenue -1% in Q3 2026; DSO 31 against a median of 31: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ3 2026
Revenue, year over year-0.8%
Receivables, year over year+0.3%
Quarter beforeQ2 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before-2.2%
Receivables y/y, quarter before-4.8%
Days sales outstanding31.3
DSO, median of eight quarters31.1
Receivables$162M
Revenue$456M

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$17M comes due within a year, 45.8× covered by cash and investments of $281M plus $505M of free cash flow.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$281M
Debt$1.9B
Net debt$1.6B
Due within a year$17M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months$505M
Cash plus free cash flow$786M
Coverage of what is due45.8
Due in the second year$368M
Balance sheet date2026-09-30

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Insufficient data

no quarter with EPS, net income and diluted shares for both this year and last

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium

Net income of $188M is not at a cyclical high against the last eight years (median $37M, best $224M): the P/E of 11.6× is on a normal year.

The figures and how they are read
market value$2.2B
net income ttm$188M
pe ttm11.60
net income median fy$37M
pe mid cycle59.20
net income peak fy$224M
yearsFY2018 / 224.0; FY2019 / 195.0; FY2020 / -182.0; FY2021 / -1.0; FY2022 / 37.0; FY2023 / -386.0; FY2024 / -204.0; FY2025 / 145.0
down years in window3

P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median

Source: Q3 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Pitney Bowes: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.