Filing Flows › Companies › Pultegroup › Earnings quality
Pultegroup earnings quality score
How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show
Score45 / 100 · grade D · rank 927 of 1027
Pultegroup (PHM) scores 45 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 927 of 1027 companies and 238 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of +2.0% of assets, higher than 92% of companies, discretionary accruals of +2.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most, adjusted earnings 4% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.61).
What earned and lost points
| Component | What the filings show | Points | Of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accruals | accruals of +2.0% of assets, higher than 92% of companies | 4 | 44 |
| Discretionary accruals | discretionary accruals of +2.7% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most | 13 | 22 |
| Non-GAAP gap | adjusted earnings 4% below GAAP | 19 | 22 |
| Earnings smoothness | profit steadier than cash flow (smoothness 0.61) | 9 | 11 |
How the score is built
Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.
Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Pultegroup: cash flow →
Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.