Filing Flows › Companies › Pricesmart › Analysis traps
Pricesmart (PSMT): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q4 FY26, to Aug 31, 2026, filed Oct 26, 2026; rules v1.1
Pricesmart (PSMT): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Aug 31, 2026. 1 to review; 1 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 113.05 a share (price 165.20); 90% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 25.72 to 200.37; across every method the research ran the range is 27 to 316. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($103M → $96M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY25 |
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $261M |
| Operating cash flow | $308M |
| Capex, year before | $158M |
| Capex | $211M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $103M |
| Free cash flow | $96M |
| Change in FCF | −$7M |
| Change in capex | $53M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | $22M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY26 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY25 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 0.4% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Stock compensation | $23M |
| Revenue | $5.9B |
| SBC / revenue | +0.4% |
| Buybacks | $9M |
| Buybacks / SBC | 0.4 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 30.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 30.2M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | +0.6% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY26 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew -4% against revenue 14% in Q4 FY26; DSO 1 against a median of 1: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q4 FY26 |
| Revenue, year over year | +13.9% |
| Receivables, year over year | -4.4% |
| Quarter before | Q3 FY26 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +12.5% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | -6.7% |
| Days sales outstanding | 1.1 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 1.3 |
| Receivables | $17M |
| Revenue | $1.5B |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q4 FY26 (receivables and revenue) · Q4 FY25 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium
$65M comes due within a year, 5.1× covered by cash and investments of $332M.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $332M |
| Debt | $169M |
| Net debt | −$163M |
| Due within a year | $65M |
| Read from | the debt maturity table |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | — |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $332M |
| Coverage of what is due | 5.1 |
| Due in the second year | $35M |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-08-31 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: FY26 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 12% and net income rose 13% in Q3 FY26; the share count rose 0.6%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q3 FY26 |
| Quarter before | Q3 FY25 |
| EPS, year before | $1.17 |
| EPS | $1.31 |
| Net income, year before | $35M |
| Net income | $40M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 30.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 30.3M shares |
| EPS growth | +12.2% |
| Net income growth | +12.9% |
| Diluted shares: change | +0.6% |
| eps from profit | $0.15 |
| eps from share count | -$0.01 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q3 FY26 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 FY25 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium
Net income of $167M is a high, but the last eight years rose almost every year (median $109M): a steady climb, not a cycle's top, so the P/E of 30.0× is not on peak profit in that sense.
The figures and how they are read
| market value | $5.0B |
| net income ttm | $167M |
| pe ttm | 30.00 |
| net income median fy | $109M |
| pe mid cycle | 45.80 |
| net income peak fy | $167M |
| years | FY19 / 73.0; FY20 / 78.0; FY21 / 98.0; FY22 / 105.0; FY23 / 109.0; FY24 / 139.0; FY25 / 148.0; FY26 / 167.0 |
| down years in window | 0 |
P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median
Source: Q4 FY26 (net income, trailing twelve months)
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 113.05 a share (price 165.20); 90% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 25.72 to 200.37; across every method the research ran the range is 27 to 316. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 113.05 |
| price | 165.20 |
| terminal value share | +89.9% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / 25.72 / 200.37; WACC / ±1 pt / 94.15 / 140.48; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 94.79 / 134.93; Capex (share of revenue) / ±1 pt / 103.04 / 123.05 |
| range all methods | 26.53; 315.82 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Pricesmart: cash flow → Earnings quality score →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.