Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › BRC Group Holdings › Analysis traps

BRC Group Holdings (RILY): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 5, 2026; rules v1.1

BRC Group Holdings (RILY): 1 rule of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026: low net debt = no refinancing risk; 2 with insufficient data; 6 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered · severity high · confidence medium

$473M of debt comes due within a year against $144M of cash and investments and $145M of free cash flow over the last twelve months: $184M short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $1.3B says nothing about when the debt falls due.

Innocent reading: A committed, undrawn credit facility covers the gap (not visible in the balance sheet).

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not applicable

a financial company: free cash flow after capex is not the measure of its business

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 1.4% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$14M
Revenue$968M
SBC / revenue+1.4%
Buybacks0
Buybacks / SBC0.0
Diluted shares, year before30.3M shares
Diluted shares30.6M shares
Diluted shares: change+0.7%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not applicable

a financial company: receivables and DSO are not its working capital

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered severity high · confidence medium

$473M of debt comes due within a year against $144M of cash and investments and $145M of free cash flow over the last twelve months: $184M short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $1.3B says nothing about when the debt falls due.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$144M
Debt$1.4B
Net debt$1.3B
Due within a year$473M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months$145M
Cash plus free cash flow$289M
Coverage of what is due0.6
Due in the second year$16M
Balance sheet date2026-09-30

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not applicable

a loss in one of the quarters: EPS growth has no meaning

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable

a financial company: J06 reads its cycle instead

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → BRC Group Holdings: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.