Filing Flows › Companies › Ranger Energy Services › Analysis traps
Ranger Energy Services (RNGR): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Jul 28, 2026; rules v1.1
Ranger Energy Services (RNGR): 2 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026: receivables growing = future cash is certain; adjusted profit = economic profit; 3 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Receivables growing = future cash is certain Triggered · severity high · confidence medium
Receivables grew 77% year over year in Q1 2026 against revenue growth of 18%, and the quarter before 14% against -1%; days sales outstanding is 56 against a median of 46 over the eight quarters before. More of each quarter's revenue is still owed by customers.
Innocent reading: Seasonality: a quarter that always ends with big shipments.
Adjusted profit = economic profit Triggered · severity medium · confidence low
Adjusted EPS was at least 10% above GAAP in 3 of the last 3 quarters (on average 41% above). Costs excluded every quarter (restructuring, stock compensation, amortisation of acquired intangibles, litigation) are a recurring cost of the business, not a one-off.
Innocent reading: A genuine one-off this year (an impairment, a settlement) that happens to span several quarters.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($50M → $43M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY2024 |
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $84M |
| Operating cash flow | $69M |
| Capex, year before | $34M |
| Capex | $26M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $50M |
| Free cash flow | $43M |
| Change in FCF | −$8M |
| Change in capex | −$8M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | −$12M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 1.2% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY2025 |
| Stock compensation | $6M |
| Revenue | $547M |
| SBC / revenue | +1.2% |
| Buybacks | $12M |
| Buybacks / SBC | 1.9 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 22.9M shares |
| Diluted shares | 22.7M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | -0.8% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Triggered severity high · confidence medium
Receivables grew 77% year over year in Q1 2026 against revenue growth of 18%, and the quarter before 14% against -1%; days sales outstanding is 56 against a median of 46 over the eight quarters before. More of each quarter's revenue is still owed by customers.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q1 2026 |
| Revenue, year over year | +17.7% |
| Receivables, year over year | +77.5% |
| Quarter before | Q4 2025 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | -0.6% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | +13.9% |
| Days sales outstanding | 55.7 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 46.4 |
| Receivables | $119M |
| Revenue | $159M |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q1 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q1 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
What would explain it innocently
- Seasonality: a quarter that always ends with big shipments
- An acquisition brought its own receivables
- New business with longer standard terms (government, large enterprise)
- Currency: receivables booked in a strengthening currency
What to look for in the filing
- The receivables ageing and the allowance for credit losses
- Any factoring or receivables sold (and whether with recourse)
- Credit terms by customer group
What would show the trap does not apply
- Receivables fall back in line with revenue in the next quarter and DSO returns to its history
- The 10-Q attributes the increase to a disclosed one-off (a large customer's timing, an acquisition) and the allowance for doubtful accounts did not rise
Look again: next filing.
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Triggered severity medium · confidence low
Adjusted EPS was at least 10% above GAAP in 3 of the last 3 quarters (on average 41% above). Costs excluded every quarter (restructuring, stock compensation, amortisation of acquired intangibles, litigation) are a recurring cost of the business, not a one-off.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap | 2025-09-30 / 0.1766 / 0.05 / 0.717; 2026-03-31 / 0.1966 / 0.12 / 0.39; 2026-06-30 / 0.3322 / 0.29 / 0.127 |
| Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP | 3 |
| Quarters compared | 3 |
| Latest gap | +12.7% |
the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)
Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted 0.18 vs GAAP 0.05) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted 0.20 vs GAAP 0.12) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted 0.33 vs GAAP 0.29)
What would explain it innocently
- A genuine one-off this year (an impairment, a settlement) that happens to span several quarters
- Amortisation of acquired intangibles, which many investors also exclude by choice
- The analysts' 'actual' is not the company's own adjusted figure
What to look for in the filing
- The reconciliation table in the earnings release: which items, how much, how often
- Whether the same items were excluded in earlier years
What would show the trap does not apply
- The reconciliation shows the excluded items ending (a restructuring with its final charge, a settlement paid) and the gap to GAAP closes in the next quarters
- The excluded items are only amortisation of acquired intangibles and the cash paid for the deals is in the investing cash flow
Look again: next filing.
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Insufficient data
no debt figure could be read from the balance sheet (the filing may tag it in other lines)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 381% and net income rose 400% in Q1 2026; the share count rose 4.0%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q1 2026 |
| Quarter before | Q1 2025 |
| EPS, year before | $0.03 |
| EPS | $0.12 |
| Net income, year before | $600K |
| Net income | $3M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 23.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 24.0M shares |
| EPS growth | +380.8% |
| Net income growth | +400.0% |
| Diluted shares: change | +4.0% |
| eps from profit | $0.10 |
| eps from share count | -$0.01 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q1 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q1 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Insufficient data
no market value or trailing net income in the valuation research
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data
no DCF in the valuation research for this company
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Ranger Energy Services: cash flow →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.