Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Safe Pro Group › Analysis traps

Safe Pro Group (SPAI): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 14, 2026; rules v1.1

Safe Pro Group (SPAI): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jun 30, 2026. 1 to review; 5 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Receivables growing = future cash is certain To review · confidence medium

Receivables outgrew revenue in Q2 2026 (2995% against 1336%) and DSO is 45 against a median of 28; one quarter can be timing, so this is one to watch rather than a pattern.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise (−$4M → −$6M): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before−$4M
Operating cash flow−$6M
Capex, year before63,801
Capex48,808
Free cash flow, year before−$4M
Free cash flow−$6M
Change in FCF−$2M
Change in capex-14,993
Working capital: change in its cash contribution$288K

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Insufficient data

fewer than two fiscal years of stock compensation and share counts on file

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain To review confidence medium

Receivables outgrew revenue in Q2 2026 (2995% against 1336%) and DSO is 45 against a median of 28; one quarter can be timing, so this is one to watch rather than a pattern.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ2 2026
Revenue, year over year+1336.1%
Receivables, year over year29.95
Quarter beforeQ1 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before+560.2%
Receivables y/y, quarter before+291.0%
Days sales outstanding44.8
DSO, median of eight quarters27.6
Receivables$1M
Revenue$1M

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q2 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q2 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$3K comes due within a year, 4035.7× covered by cash and investments of $10M.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$10M
Debt$146K
Net debt−$10M
Due within a year2,535
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months−$8M
Cash plus free cash flow$10M
Coverage of what is due4035.7
Due in the second year3,219
Balance sheet date2026-06-30

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Insufficient data

no quarter with EPS, net income and diluted shares for both this year and last

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Insufficient data

no market value or trailing net income in the valuation research

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value Insufficient data

no DCF in the valuation research for this company

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Safe Pro Group: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.