Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › AT&T › Earnings quality

AT&T earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score63 / 100 · grade C · rank 598 of 1027

AT&T (T) scores 63 of 100 for earnings quality, grade C: rank 598 of 1027 companies and 19 of 30 in communication. It loses the most points on accruals of -4.5% of assets, lower than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed, adjusted earnings 23% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.97 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.88).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -4.5% of assets, lower than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash)1427
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.97 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed820
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -1.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1113
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 23% below GAAP313
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 2.88)77
T: share of the available points, by componentT: share of the available points, by componentAccruals54%Discretionary accruals80%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score40%Non-GAAP gap22%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → AT&T: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.