Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › UGI › Earnings quality

UGI earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score68 / 100 · grade B · rank 414 of 1027

UGI (UGI) scores 68 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 414 of 1027 companies and 24 of 55 in utilities. It loses the most points on accruals of -3.6% of assets, higher than 56% of companies (profit backed by cash), Montier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed, discretionary accruals of +1.2% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.60 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 4.31).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.6% of assets, higher than 56% of companies (profit backed by cash)1227
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.60 (normal)2020
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed820
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +1.2% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most1013
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 5% above GAAP1113
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 4.31)77
UGI: share of the available points, by componentUGI: share of the available points, by componentAccruals44%Discretionary accruals79%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score40%Non-GAAP gap84%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → UGI: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.