Filing Flows › Companies › Universal › Analysis traps
Universal (UVV): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 FY27, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 4, 2026; rules v1.1
Universal (UVV): 1 rule of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026: low net debt = no refinancing risk. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 3 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered · severity high · confidence medium
$579M of debt comes due within a year against $47M of cash and investments and $24M of free cash flow over the last twelve months: $508M short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $1.1B says nothing about when the debt falls due.
Innocent reading: A committed, undrawn credit facility covers the gap (not visible in the balance sheet).
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 12.35 a share (price 39.41); 81% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -29.62 to 54.33; across every method the research ran the range is -165 to 346. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow did not rise ($264M → $80M): the trap does not arise.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY25 |
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $327M |
| Operating cash flow | $129M |
| Capex, year before | $63M |
| Capex | $49M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $264M |
| Free cash flow | $80M |
| Change in FCF | −$184M |
| Change in capex | −$14M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | −$352M |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY26 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY25 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 0.2% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Stock compensation | $7M |
| Revenue | $2.9B |
| SBC / revenue | +0.2% |
| Buybacks | 0 |
| Buybacks / SBC | 0.0 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 25.1M shares |
| Diluted shares | 25.2M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | +0.2% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY26 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew -2% against revenue -18% in Q2 FY27; DSO 58 against a median of 74: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q2 FY27 |
| Revenue, year over year | -17.6% |
| Receivables, year over year | -2.1% |
| Quarter before | Q1 FY27 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | -12.2% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | -17.9% |
| Days sales outstanding | 58.4 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 74.1 |
| Receivables | $436M |
| Revenue | $617M |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q2 FY27 (receivables and revenue) · Q2 FY26 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data
no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Triggered severity high · confidence medium
$579M of debt comes due within a year against $47M of cash and investments and $24M of free cash flow over the last twelve months: $508M short, to be refinanced or raised. Net debt of $1.1B says nothing about when the debt falls due.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $47M |
| Debt | $1.2B |
| Net debt | $1.1B |
| Due within a year | $579M |
| Read from | the current portion of debt on the balance sheet |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | $24M |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $71M |
| Coverage of what is due | 0.1 |
| Due in the second year | — |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-09-30 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: 2026-09-30 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
What would explain it innocently
- A committed, undrawn credit facility covers the gap (not visible in the balance sheet)
- The notes are routinely rolled over in the commercial-paper or bond market at an investment-grade rating
- Cash held abroad or in subsidiaries can be moved to where the debt is
- A sale of a business or asset already agreed brings the cash
What to look for in the filing
- Undrawn committed facilities and their covenants
- The cost and rating of the refinancing
- Restricted cash and the operating minimum
What would show the trap does not apply
- The 10-K lists an undrawn credit facility that covers the debt due, or the maturity is refinanced before it falls due
- Cash plus FCF of the next quarter exceeds the debt due within a year
Look again: next filing.
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Insufficient data
no quarter with EPS, net income and diluted shares for both this year and last
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not applicable
a loss on a trailing or mid-cycle basis: the P/E has no meaning
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 12.35 a share (price 39.41); 81% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from -29.62 to 54.33; across every method the research ran the range is -165 to 346. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 12.35 |
| price | 39.41 |
| terminal value share | +81.0% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / -29.62 / 54.33; WACC / ±1 pt / -2.08 / 42.39; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 1.4 / 25.78; Terminal growth / ±0.5 pt / 7.67 / 19.0 |
| range all methods | -165.41; 345.62 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Universal: cash flow → Earnings quality score →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.