Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Veralto › Earnings quality

Veralto earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score67 / 100 · grade B · rank 462 of 1027

Veralto (VLTO) scores 67 of 100 for earnings quality, grade B: rank 462 of 1027 companies and 101 of 287 in industrials. It loses the most points on accruals of -1.9% of assets, higher than 73% of companies, Montier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed, discretionary accruals of -2.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most. It earns full or near-full marks for Beneish M-score -2.52: clean (below −2.22), Dechow F-score 0.43 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.12).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -1.9% of assets, higher than 73% of companies520
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -2.52: clean (below −2.22)1515
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.43 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 4 of 6 checks failed515
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of -2.1% of assets (modified Jones), smaller than most710
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 7 of 9810
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 9% below GAAP710
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 1.12)55
VLTO: share of the available points, by componentVLTO: share of the available points, by componentAccruals27%Discretionary accruals66%Beneish M-score100%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score33%Piotroski F-score78%Non-GAAP gap70%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Veralto: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.