Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Wolverine World Wide › Analysis traps

Wolverine World Wide (WWW): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 2026, to Jul 4, 2026, filed Aug 13, 2026; rules v1.1

Wolverine World Wide (WWW): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jul 4, 2026. 2 to review; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

Adjusted profit = economic profit To review · confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 1 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high

The DCF's point value is 17.60 a share (price 21.33); 66% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 9.69 to 25.50; across every method the research ran the range is -32 to 78. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise ($160M → $126M): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2026
Operating cash flow, year before$180M
Operating cash flow$140M
Capex, year before$20M
Capex$14M
Free cash flow, year before$160M
Free cash flow$126M
Change in FCF−$34M
Change in capex−$6M
Working capital: change in its cash contribution−$77M

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2026 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 1.3% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2026
Stock compensation$24M
Revenue$1.9B
SBC / revenue+1.3%
Buybacks$14M
Buybacks / SBC0.6
Diluted shares, year before80.0M shares
Diluted shares81.7M shares
Diluted shares: change+2.1%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2026 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew -13% against revenue 7% in Q2 2026; DSO 37 against a median of 45: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ2 2026
Revenue, year over year+6.8%
Receivables, year over year-13.4%
Quarter beforeQ1 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before+11.0%
Receivables y/y, quarter before-22.4%
Days sales outstanding36.5
DSO, median of eight quarters45.1
Receivables$221M
Revenue$506M

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q2 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q2 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit To review confidence low

Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 1 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.

The figures and how they are read
Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap2025-09-30 / 0.36 / 0.3 / 0.167; 2026-03-31 / 0.25 / 0.24 / 0.04; 2026-06-30 / 0.4 / 0.37 / 0.075
Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP1
Quarters compared3
Latest gap+7.5%

the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)

Source: 2025-09-30 (adjusted 0.36 vs GAAP 0.30) · 2026-03-31 (adjusted 0.25 vs GAAP 0.24) · 2026-06-30 (adjusted 0.40 vs GAAP 0.37)

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$75M comes due within a year, 4.5× covered by cash and investments of $158M plus $175M of free cash flow.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$158M
Debt$601M
Net debt$443M
Due within a year$75M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months$175M
Cash plus free cash flow$334M
Coverage of what is due4.5
Due in the second year0
Balance sheet date2026-07-04

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2026 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high

EPS rose 65% and net income rose 67% in Q1 2026; the share count rose 1.1%: EPS growth follows profit growth.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ1 2026
Quarter beforeQ1 2025
EPS, year before$0.15
EPS$0.25
Net income, year before$12M
Net income$20M
Diluted shares, year before80.8M shares
Diluted shares81.7M shares
EPS growth+64.7%
Net income growth+66.9%
Diluted shares: change+1.1%
eps from profit$0.10
eps from share count$0.00

EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)

Source: Q1 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q1 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Not triggered confidence medium

Net income of $114M is not at a cyclical high against the last eight years (median $69M, best $200M): the P/E of 15.3× is on a normal year.

The figures and how they are read
market value$1.7B
net income ttm$114M
pe ttm15.30
net income median fy$69M
pe mid cycle25.40
net income peak fy$200M
yearsFY2018 / 200.0; FY2019 / 128.0; FY2021 / -137.0; FY2022 / 69.0; FY2022 / -188.0; FY2023 / -40.0; FY2024 / 48.0; FY2026 / 96.0
down years in window3

P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median

Source: Q2 2026 (net income, trailing twelve months)

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high

The DCF's point value is 17.60 a share (price 21.33); 66% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 9.69 to 25.50; across every method the research ran the range is -32 to 78. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

The figures and how they are read
dcf value17.60
price21.33
terminal value share+66.3%
swing by inputOperating margin / ±3 pts / 9.69 / 25.5; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 13.69 / 22.24; WACC / ±1 pt / 14.97 / 21.02; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 16.17 / 19.02
range all methods-32.29; 77.89

the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran

Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Wolverine World Wide: cash flow → Earnings quality score →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.