Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Gen Digital › Earnings quality

Gen Digital earnings quality score

How much of the reported profit is backed by cash, and how many markers of managed earnings the filings show

Score45 / 100 · grade D · rank 928 of 1027

Gen Digital (GEN) scores 45 of 100 for earnings quality, grade D: rank 928 of 1027 companies and 185 of 203 in technology. It loses the most points on Beneish M-score -1.77: flagged (above −1.78), accruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash), adjusted earnings 29% below GAAP. It earns full or near-full marks for Dechow F-score 0.81 (normal), profit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.99).

What earned and lost points

ComponentWhat the filings showPointsOf
Accrualsaccruals of -3.7% of assets, higher than 54% of companies (profit backed by cash)920
Beneish M-scoreBeneish M-score -1.77: flagged (above −1.78)015
Dechow F-scoreDechow F-score 0.81 (normal)1515
Montier C-scoreMontier C-score 3 of 5 checks failed615
Discretionary accrualsdiscretionary accruals of +6.5% of assets (modified Jones), larger than most210
Piotroski F-scorePiotroski F-score 7 of 9810
Non-GAAP gapadjusted earnings 29% below GAAP010
Earnings smoothnessprofit about as variable as cash flow (smoothness 0.99)55
GEN: share of the available points, by componentGEN: share of the available points, by componentAccruals46%Discretionary accruals24%Dechow F-score100%Montier C-score40%Piotroski F-score78%Non-GAAP gap2%Earnings smoothness100%

How the score is built

Eight published measures, each scored against the whole universe or on its own scale and weighted: accruals 20, discretionary accruals 10, Beneish M 15, Dechow F 15, Montier C 15, Piotroski F 10, the non-GAAP gap 10, smoothness 5. A measure that cannot be computed (Beneish for a bank, say) drops out and the rest is rescaled, so every company is scored on what applies to it.

Every company ranked → The full quality workbench, live → Gen Digital: cash flow →

Computed from the companies’ own XBRL filings (latest fiscal year) by published formulas; a statistical screen, not an audit or an accusation. A low score means the reported profit shows more of the markers of managed or low-quality earnings than its peers. Not investment advice.