Filing Flows

Filing Flows › Companies › Pacs Group › Analysis traps

Pacs Group (PACS): analysis traps

Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q3 2026, to Sep 30, 2026, filed Nov 3, 2026; rules v1.1

Pacs Group (PACS): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Sep 30, 2026. 1 to review; 2 with insufficient data; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.

Check these first

A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high

The DCF's point value is 49.86 a share (price 49.85); 90% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 27.29 to 72.42; across every method the research ran the range is 2 to 190. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.

Every rule

A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high

Free cash flow did not rise ($301M → $299M): the trap does not arise.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal year beforeFY2024
Fiscal yearFY2025
Operating cash flow, year before$367M
Operating cash flow$404M
Capex, year before$66M
Capex$105M
Free cash flow, year before$301M
Free cash flow$299M
Change in FCF−$2M
Change in capex$39M
Working capital: change in its cash contribution−$169M

FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement

Source: FY2025 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY2024 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)

A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high

Stock compensation is 1.0% of revenue: small enough that adding it back changes little.

The figures and how they are read
Fiscal yearFY2025
Stock compensation$54M
Revenue$5.3B
SBC / revenue+1.0%
Buybacks0
Buybacks / SBC0.0
Diluted shares, year before148.6M shares
Diluted shares156.7M shares
Diluted shares: change+5.5%

SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section

Source: FY2025 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)

B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium

Receivables grew 5% against revenue 11% in Q3 2026; DSO 40 against a median of 43: collections are keeping pace with sales.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ3 2026
Revenue, year over year+11.5%
Receivables, year over year+5.1%
Quarter beforeQ2 2026
Revenue y/y, quarter before+9.1%
Receivables y/y, quarter before-0.6%
Days sales outstanding39.7
DSO, median of eight quarters43.3
Receivables$660M
Revenue$1.5B

receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before

Source: Q3 2026 (receivables and revenue) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit Insufficient data

no reconciliation table read from the releases yet and fewer than three quarters with both an adjusted and a GAAP EPS

C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium

$4M comes due within a year, 126.2× covered by cash and investments of $115M plus $448M of free cash flow.

The figures and how they are read
Cash and investments$115M
Debt$353M
Net debt$238M
Due within a year$4M
Read fromthe debt maturity table
Free cash flow, twelve months$448M
Cash plus free cash flow$563M
Coverage of what is due126.2
Due in the second year$8M
Balance sheet date2026-09-30

due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed

Source: FY2025 (debt maturities, cash and investments)

D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high

EPS rose 17% and net income rose 16% in Q3 2026; the share count fell 0.5%: EPS growth follows profit growth.

The figures and how they are read
QuarterQ3 2026
Quarter beforeQ3 2025
EPS, year before$0.32
EPS$0.37
Net income, year before$52M
Net income$61M
Diluted shares, year before164.7M shares
Diluted shares163.9M shares
EPS growth+16.7%
Net income growth+16.1%
Diluted shares: change-0.5%
eps from profit$0.05
eps from share count$0.00

EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)

Source: Q3 2026 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q3 2025 (the same quarter a year earlier)

E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued Insufficient data

4 fiscal years of net income on file; a cycle needs five

E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high

The DCF's point value is 49.86 a share (price 49.85); 90% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 27.29 to 72.42; across every method the research ran the range is 2 to 190. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.

The figures and how they are read
dcf value49.86
price49.85
terminal value share+90.0%
swing by inputOperating margin / ±3 pts / 27.29 / 72.42; WACC / ±1 pt / 38.35 / 69.74; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 40.07 / 61.6; Terminal growth / ±0.5 pt / 45.29 / 55.8
range all methods2.24; 190.38

the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran

Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)

What would explain it innocently

What to look for in the filing

What would show the trap does not apply

Look again: next filing.

J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable

not a bank

J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable

not a REIT

What the statuses mean

Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.

Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.

Record a view

A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).

Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Pacs Group: cash flow →

Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.