Filing Flows › Companies › Workday › Analysis traps
Workday (WDAY): analysis traps
Where its figures could mislead a reader, and what to check before taking them at face value · Data: Q2 FY27, to Jul 31, 2026, filed Aug 27, 2026; rules v1.1
Workday (WDAY): 0 rules of 10 triggered on the filings to Jul 31, 2026. 3 to review; 2 not applicable. Each is a question to verify, with the normal explanation that would produce the same figures.
Check these first
Adjusted profit = economic profit To review · confidence low
Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.
Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued To review · confidence medium
Net income of $1.3B is at a high against a median of $29M over eight years; at 38.0× the market is not pricing it as cheap, but a multiple on this year's profit still understates the mid-cycle one (1617.6×).
A precise DCF value = the true value To review · confidence high
The DCF's point value is 78.28 a share (price 192.90); 71% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 56.76 to 99.79; across every method the research ran the range is 20 to 309. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
Innocent reading: A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary.
Every rule
A01 FCF growth = the business improved Not triggered confidence high
Free cash flow rose $585M to $2.8B; working capital and lower capex explain 18% of it, so most of the gain is in operating cash flow itself.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year before | FY25 |
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Operating cash flow, year before | $2.5B |
| Operating cash flow | $2.9B |
| Capex, year before | $269M |
| Capex | $162M |
| Free cash flow, year before | $2.2B |
| Free cash flow | $2.8B |
| Change in FCF | $585M |
| Change in capex | −$107M |
| Working capital: change in its cash contribution | −$44M |
| Of which: capex cut | $107M |
| Of which: working capital released | 0.00 |
| Share of the increase that need not repeat | +18.3% |
| Operating cash flow before working capital: change | 522000000.00 |
FCF = operating cash flow − cash capex; ΔFCF = ΔOCF − ΔCapEx; the working-capital part is the change in the cash-bridge items (receivables, inventory, payables, accruals), with the sign of the cash flow statement
Source: FY26 (cash flow statement, fiscal year) · FY25 (cash flow statement, fiscal year before)
A07 Stock compensation added back = no economic cost Not triggered confidence high
Stock compensation is 17.0% of revenue, but buybacks of $2.9B covered it (1.8×) and the diluted share count fell 0.4%: the dilution has been paid for in cash.
The figures and how they are read
| Fiscal year | FY26 |
| Stock compensation | $1.6B |
| Revenue | $9.6B |
| SBC / revenue | +17.0% |
| Buybacks | $2.9B |
| Buybacks / SBC | 1.8 |
| Diluted shares, year before | 269.2M shares |
| Diluted shares | 268.1M shares |
| Diluted shares: change | -0.4% |
SBC / revenue from the cash flow statement's add-back; the diluted weighted share count year over year; buybacks from the financing section
Source: FY26 (stock compensation, buybacks and the diluted share count, fiscal year)
B02 Receivables growing = future cash is certain Not triggered confidence medium
Receivables grew 18% against revenue 13% in Q2 FY27; DSO 60 against a median of 66: collections are keeping pace with sales.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q2 FY27 |
| Revenue, year over year | +12.8% |
| Receivables, year over year | +17.8% |
| Quarter before | Q1 FY27 |
| Revenue y/y, quarter before | +13.5% |
| Receivables y/y, quarter before | +15.6% |
| Days sales outstanding | 60.3 |
| DSO, median of eight quarters | 65.8 |
| Receivables | $1.9B |
| Revenue | $2.6B |
receivables and revenue against the same quarter a year earlier; DSO = receivables / quarterly revenue × days, against the median of the eight quarters before
Source: Q2 FY27 (receivables and revenue) · Q2 FY26 (the same quarter a year earlier)
B08 Adjusted profit = economic profit To review confidence low
Adjusted EPS was 10% or more above GAAP in 2 of the last 3 quarters: read the reconciliation before taking the adjusted figure.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter / adjusted EPS / GAAP EPS / gap | 2025-10-31 / 2.32 / 0.94 / 0.595; 2026-04-30 / 2.66 / 0.87 / 0.673; 2026-07-31 / 2.75 / 2.57 / 0.065 |
| Quarters with adjusted ≥ 10% above GAAP | 2 |
| Quarters compared | 3 |
| Latest gap | +6.5% |
the analysts' 'actual' (usually the company's adjusted EPS) against GAAP net income ÷ diluted shares for the matching quarter; a gap of 10% or more counts (the stand-in until three releases' reconciliation tables are on file)
Source: 2025-10-31 (adjusted 2.32 vs GAAP 0.94) · 2026-04-30 (adjusted 2.66 vs GAAP 0.87) · 2026-07-31 (adjusted 2.75 vs GAAP 2.57)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The reconciliation shows the excluded items ending (a restructuring with its final charge, a settlement paid) and the gap to GAAP closes in the next quarters
- The excluded items are only amortisation of acquired intangibles and the cash paid for the deals is in the investing cash flow
Look again: next filing.
C02 Low net debt = no refinancing risk Not triggered confidence medium
$999M comes due within a year, 6.2× covered by cash and investments of $3.4B plus $2.8B of free cash flow.
The figures and how they are read
| Cash and investments | $3.4B |
| Debt | $3.0B |
| Net debt | −$414M |
| Due within a year | $999M |
| Read from | the current portion of debt on the balance sheet |
| Free cash flow, twelve months | $2.8B |
| Cash plus free cash flow | $6.2B |
| Coverage of what is due | 6.2 |
| Due in the second year | — |
| Balance sheet date | 2026-07-31 |
due within a year from the maturity table (else the current portion of debt), against cash and investments plus free cash flow over the last twelve months (zero if negative); no credit lines assumed
Source: 2026-07-31 (debt maturities, cash and investments)
D03 EPS growth = profit growth Not triggered confidence high
EPS rose 204% and net income rose 177% in Q2 FY27; the share count fell 8.8%: EPS growth follows profit growth.
The figures and how they are read
| Quarter | Q2 FY27 |
| Quarter before | Q2 FY26 |
| EPS, year before | $0.84 |
| EPS | $2.57 |
| Net income, year before | $228M |
| Net income | $632M |
| Diluted shares, year before | 270.2M shares |
| Diluted shares | 246.3M shares |
| EPS growth | +204.0% |
| Net income growth | +177.2% |
| Diluted shares: change | -8.8% |
| eps from profit | $1.50 |
| eps from share count | $0.23 |
EPS and net income against the same quarter a year earlier; the EPS bridge attributes the change to profit first, then to the share count (the order is fixed and disclosed)
Source: Q2 FY27 (net income, diluted shares, EPS) · Q2 FY26 (the same quarter a year earlier)
E02 Low P/E at a cyclical peak = undervalued To review confidence medium
Net income of $1.3B is at a high against a median of $29M over eight years; at 38.0× the market is not pricing it as cheap, but a multiple on this year's profit still understates the mid-cycle one (1617.6×).
The figures and how they are read
| market value | $47.5B |
| net income ttm | $1.3B |
| pe ttm | 38.00 |
| net income median fy | $29M |
| pe mid cycle | 1,617.60 |
| net income peak fy | $1.4B |
| years | FY19 / -418.0; FY20 / -481.0; FY21 / -282.0; FY22 / 29.0; FY23 / -367.0; FY24 / 1381.0; FY25 / 526.0; FY26 / 693.0 |
| down years in window | 3 |
P/E on the trailing twelve months' net income against the P/E on the median net income of the last eight fiscal years (a mid-cycle stand-in); 'at a peak' = this year's profit at or above 90% of the best year and at least 1.3× the median
Source: Q2 FY27 (net income, trailing twelve months)
What would show the trap does not apply
- Profit holds at this level through the next two years (the eight-year peak was a new base, not a top)
- The industry's capacity and prices stay where they are rather than reverting
Look again: next filing.
E07 A precise DCF value = the true value To review confidence high
The DCF's point value is 78.28 a share (price 192.90); 71% of it is the terminal value, a number about years no one has seen. Moving operating margin by ±3 pts alone takes it from 56.76 to 99.79; across every method the research ran the range is 20 to 309. The value is a range; the decimals are not information.
The figures and how they are read
| dcf value | 78.28 |
| price | 192.90 |
| terminal value share | +71.1% |
| swing by input | Operating margin / ±3 pts / 56.76 / 99.79; Revenue growth (each year) / ±5 pts / 64.85 / 94.2; WACC / ±1 pt / 68.59 / 91.28; Tax rate / ±5 pts / 74.35 / 80.3 |
| range all methods | 20.0; 308.51 |
the DCF's point value against the share of it that is the terminal value and the value at each input moved by one step (growth ±5 pts, WACC ±1 pt, margin ±3 pts …); the range across every method the research ran
Source: 2026-11-08 (valuation research)
What would explain it innocently
- A stable, mature business with a narrow range of outcomes, where the point value is a fair summary
- The inputs that matter most are themselves well known (a regulated return, a long contract)
What to look for in the filing
- Which input you believe differs from the research's and why
- What the price implies for growth (the reverse DCF on the fair-value page)
What would show the trap does not apply
- The DCF's value is robust to the terminal growth and discount rate (the range's low end is still above the price)
- The company's cash flows over the next three years track the DCF's early years
Look again: next filing.
J06 A bank's low P/E and high profit = safe Not applicable
not a bank
J08 A REIT's low net income = the dividend is unsafe Not applicable
not a REIT
What the statuses mean
Triggered: the filings show the pattern; read the normal explanations and the missing evidence before concluding anything. To review: one quarter or a weak signal; a reader's judgement, not a pattern. Not triggered: the pattern is absent on these figures. Insufficient data: the filings read so far do not hold what the rule needs; this is not a clean bill. Not applicable: the rule is not meant for this kind of company (a bank's working capital, a loss-making quarter's EPS growth). Out of date: the latest filing is more than fifteen months old.
Severity is what the pattern could mean for cash, value or solvency; confidence is how reliable the inputs and the reading are. The two are kept apart.
Record a view
A reader's judgement, grounds, what would change it and the next review; kept in the browser (needs JavaScript).
Every rule and the companies it triggers on → Workday: cash flow → Earnings quality score →
Each rule reads the company's own filings by a fixed formula and says what would explain the same figures innocently. A triggered rule is a question to verify, not a finding of manipulation, and not a view on the stock. Missing data is shown as missing, never as clear. Not investment advice.